Some interesting comments on the post there, but lots of people overplaying the dangers of mercury.
Sometimes when you’re looking around for something to scan in your new-ish CT scanner the answer just lands in your lap.
I’ve been doing #xraymyadvent again this year, but thought I’d test out the new scanner with an item more in keeping with the scanner’s intended use. Searching around the lab I found no obvious items. Until I looked down at the floor, this is what I found.
A poor dead mouse.
This is just 60 projections from the full CT scan – it looks like the scanner worked well.
WOW – what a clickbait title that is…
Back from having spent a few days between Christmas and New Year in Palma, Majorca. On the last day there I noticed I could just see the dome of the Planetarium of Majorca (or the telescope dome, I’m not sure which) from the hotel terrace. Seeing conditions were not great, but the small white point on the mountain top was clearly visible by reflected sunlight. It did look to be just on the edge of visibility, so now I’m back I wondered just how close to being invisible it really was.
- Telescope dome position : 39.642528°N 2.950516°E (from wikipedia)
- My viewing position : 39.555666°N 2.623219°E (from photographic GPS and google maps)
Some derived data:
- Dome diameter : 15m (measured off google earth)
- Distance between these points : 29.668km
Angular size :
- 5.056×10^-4 radians
- 0.02897 degrees
- 1′ 44.3″ arc seconds
This seems pretty small, how’s it compare to things we’d usually see?
- Sun diameter : 31’30″Full Moon diameter : 29’20”
- Planet Venus at closest : 1’00”
- Brightest star in the sky – Sirius : 0.005936″
(All values from wikipedia)
The dome appears larger than the brightest star in the sky and roughly the same size the planet Venus does. These are both perfectly visible, so why did the dome appear just visible to me? I’m guessing it’s because the dome was only reflecting a small amount of light, and I was viewing it against quite a bright background (blue sky) too. Atmospheric haze and thermal twinkles probably didn’t help.
So although I should have been able to see it pretty clearly (if it had been emitting it’s own light, against a dark background) , I was probably pretty lucky to have seen it at all given the atmospheric conditions.
Happy new year!
Over 2000 letters, none of which were ever delivered. 600 of which have never been opened. We’re going to try to virtually open then using X-Rays.
More here : http://brienne.org/
I do like a good eclipse, but not enough to be awake at 3am to photograph it. So, I set up a camera to take one picture every 30 seconds, pointed it roughly where I expected the moon to be at the time of maximum eclipse and set it recording.
Stacking the images with StarStaX produced this rather different view of the eclipse.
Using the same photographs I produced a video of the eclipse too. It starts dark until the moon moves into shot, then the moon fades out nicely, you can see the shadow of the Earth moving down the face of the moon, and then the moon reappearing.