Some time back, a friend @codfishcatfish was building a GPS disciplined oscillator for radio measurements. Part of the circuit uses a MAX232 device to interface the low voltage digital signals to a PC serial port. He found his cheap (from eBay) MAX232s got very hot and failed in use.
It was obvious the devices were fake, so I offered to tear one down to see what it really was, a cheap clone or a re-badged something else?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4f9a/b4f9a0bb61cde4d44655daf967d08b7c380a9807" alt="A couple of sacrificial fake ICs"
The standard technique to remove all the epoxy and metal to leave the bare silicon die is to use strong nitric acid. So I cut the legs off the chips, no point wasting acid dissolving those, and ground away some of the epoxy resin to speed up the dissolution.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e5d0/9e5d0562a8670ba1ba857e00edd097d5acf12458" alt="ICs with legs and some of the epoxy package removed"
Soaking the ICs for an hour in room temperature nitric acid had no discernible effect, so I heated up the acid. The reaction became very vigorous!
It took about 20 minutes to remove sufficient epoxy to see the silicon die – it also removed the lead-frame and bond-wires so there was no chance to test the ICs after de-capping.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/744f1/744f1e40dca1956923c7b3bc40af5bda6bf16645" alt="Cruddy mess after the acid finishes its work"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4dd0/b4dd0997bde6c14043f7a860317731ee8bc55b1e" alt="After the acid had done its work the bare die was visible in both ICs"
The ICs were dried and the die removed by scraping away the carbonised epoxy with a scalpel. This done, the die could be examined under high magnification to see if it looked anything like a real MAX232 or I could see any other identifying features.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ab8/68ab8119bc9c5d74095d431c2381dc3c22215e2a" alt="Bare die of fake MAX232"
Comparison with a real MAX232 die proves these ICs are fake. The only identification I could find on the die is the following
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5524/f552457f62e3545a7fba35c49ea4016928729f79" alt="Identification marks"
So I’m non the wiser as to who actually made these, but the device does seem to show a general resemblance to the layout of a real MAX232 – they didn’t just program a micro-controller to do the job or something similar.
It was just a fun diversion and a chance to try something I’d wanted to do for a while. I might try to find some more interesting ICs to pull apart and take better images of.